Tuesday, September 26, 2017

Cyber Warfare Is The Future – Has Our Power Grid Already Been Hacked? – Re-Shared and administered by Aaron Halim



Cyber Warfare Is The Future - Has Our Power Grid Already Been Hacked?

News Image
 
By Daisy Luther/Organic Prepper September 26, 2017


Share this article:
















A report by internet security experts, Symantec, says that
a hacking group called Dragonfly 2.0 has gained access to 20 power
company networks. The American power grid has been hacked, but for some
reason, the culprits restrained themselves from taking down the power
like they did in Ukraine recently.

The targets
were in the United States, Turkey, and Switzerland. According to
Symantec, the hackers did gain access to the interface they would need
to control the power equipment, with which they could cause a widespread
blackout. Eric Chien, a Symantec security analyst, told Wired:

"There's
a difference between being a step away from conducting sabotage and
actually being in a position to conduct sabotage ... being able to flip
the switch on power generation. We're now talking about on-the-ground
technical evidence this could happen in the US, and there's nothing left
standing in the way except the motivation of some actor out in the
world." 

While we were all focused on the
natural disasters like wildfires and hurricanes looming over us, this
report went all but unnoticed by the mainstream and alternative media
alike.

A power grid attack could shut down
commerce and destroy our already precarious financial system. It could
take down our medical system. If the damage was long-lasting, chaos
would erupt and it wouldn't take long for the death toll to skyrocket,
so dependent are we on power at the flip of a switch.









How did the hackers get in?

Remember
how John Podesta ended up being the victim of a phishing scheme that
allowed the Clinton campaign to be hacked? This was pretty much the same
thing. The Symantec report explains that this has been going on for a
couple of years now, but that activity has sharply increased this year:

Symantec
has strong indications of attacker activity in organizations in the
U.S., Turkey, and Switzerland, with traces of activity in organizations
outside of these countries. The U.S. and Turkey were also among the
countries targeted by Dragonfly in its earlier campaign, though the
focus on organizations in Turkey does appear to have increased
dramatically in this more recent campaign.

As
it did in its prior campaign between 2011 and 2014, Dragonfly 2.0 uses a
variety of infection vectors in an effort to gain access to a victim's
network, including malicious emails, watering hole attacks, and
Trojanized software.

The earliest activity
identified by Symantec in this renewed campaign was a malicious email
campaign that sent emails disguised as an invitation to a New Year's Eve
party to targets in the energy sector in December 2015.

The
group conducted further targeted malicious email campaigns during 2016
and into 2017. The emails contained very specific content related to the
energy sector, as well as some related to general business concerns.
Once opened, the attached malicious document would attempt to leak
victims' network credentials to a server outside of the targeted
organization.

In July, Cisco blogged about
email-based attacks targeting the energy sector using a toolkit called
Phishery. Some of the emails sent in 2017 that were observed by Symantec
were also using the Phishery toolkit (Trojan.Phisherly), to steal
victims' credentials via a template injection attack. This toolkit
became generally available on GitHub in late 2016,

As
well as sending malicious emails, the attackers also used watering hole
attacks to harvest network credentials, by compromising websites that
were likely to be visited by those involved in the energy sector.

The
stolen credentials were then used in follow-up attacks against the
target organizations. In one instance, after a victim visited one of the
compromised servers, Backdoor.Goodor was installed on their machine via
PowerShell 11 days later. Backdoor.Goodor provides the attackers with
remote access to the victim's machine...

...Symantec
also has evidence to suggest that files masquerading as Flash updates
may be used to install malicious backdoors onto target networks--perhaps
by using social engineering to convince a victim they needed to
download an update for their Flash player. Shortly after visiting
specific URLs, a file named "install_flash_player.exe" was seen on
victim computers, followed shortly by the Trojan.Karagany.B backdoor.









Typically, the attackers will install one or two
backdoors onto victim computers to give them remote access and allow
them to install additional tools if necessary. Goodor, Karagany.B, and
Dorshel are examples of backdoors used, along with Trojan.Heriplor. 

The moral of this story? Be careful what you do online.

This was a recon mission.

So,
they got in but why didn't they do anything? According to one expert,
they were just in there looking around. John Hultquist, a researcher for
FireEye security, said of another such intrusion, "In our experience
groups that have solely targeted energy like this have been carrying out
reconnaissance for attack,"

According to the report by Symantec:

The
Dragonfly group appears to be interested in both learning how energy
facilities operate and also gaining access to operational systems
themselves, to the extent that the group now potentially has the ability
to sabotage or gain control of these systems should it decide to do
so. 

Back in July of this year, hackers got
into an American nuclear power plant in Kansas. On the bright side, they
were just into the business side of the Wolf Creek nuclear power plant
near Burlington, Kansas, and did not obtain access to the controls. But
it's still pretty unsettling that they'd even get that close. 

If
someone was able to get into the control section, not only could they
cause a power outage, but they could potentially disable the nuclear
safeguards. Eric Chien suspects that while this hack was originally
blamed on the Russians (because, really, what isn't blamed on the
Russians?) that the Dragonfly 2.0 hackers were the ones who were
responsible. ""It's highly unlikely this is just coincidental."

Symantec seems to believe this will lead to something much, much worse:

Sabotage
attacks are typically preceded by an intelligence-gathering phase where
attackers collect information about target networks and systems and
acquire credentials that will be used in later campaigns...The original
Dragonfly campaigns now appear to have been a more exploratory phase
where the attackers were simply trying to gain access to the networks of
targeted organizations. 

The Dragonfly 2.0
campaigns show how the attackers may be entering into a new phase, with
recent campaigns potentially providing them with access to operational
systems, access that could be used for more disruptive purposes in
future. 

Who is behind Dragonfly?

Symantec
isn't sure who is behind the intrusions and says that many of their
actions are aimed at making it difficult to figure out.

Some of the group's activity appears to be aimed at making it more difficult to determine who precisely is behind it:

The
attackers used more generally available malware and "living off the
land" tools, such as administration tools like PowerShell, PsExec, and
Bitsadmin, which may be part of a strategy to make attribution more
difficult. The Phishery toolkit became available on Github in 2016, and a
tool used by the group--Screenutil--also appears to use some code from
CodeProject.










The attackers also did not use any zero days. As with the
group's use of publicly available tools, this could be an attempt to
deliberately thwart attribution, or it could indicate a lack of
resources.
Some code strings in the malware were in Russian.
However, some were also in French, which indicates that one of these
languages may be a false flag.

Conflicting
evidence and what appear to be attempts at misattribution make it
difficult to definitively state where this attack group is based or who
is behind it.  

The report also references the possibility of a false flag.

Our power grid has been hacked.

Our
grid has been hacked. Symantec's report refuses to disclose which power
plants were compromised, but there seems to be no doubt the hackers
were able to gain access to operational control of them. And while this
has been going on for a few years now, they're getting bolder and nearly
have the pieces in place to widespread sabotage our power grid.

What
is clear is that Dragonfly is a highly experienced threat actor,
capable of compromising numerous organizations, stealing information,
and gaining access to key systems. What it plans to do with all this
intelligence has yet to become clear, but its capabilities do extend to
materially disrupting targeted organizations should it choose to do so. 

After
last December's malware attack that took down the grid in Ukraine, the
power was back on in most places within 6 hours. But...two months later,
the controls were still not fully operational. Nothing was able to be
done remotely. Someone had to manually control the breakers for months
after the attack.

In the US, it might not go so smoothly.

That's
actually a better outcome than what might occur in the US, experts say,
since many power grid control systems here don't have manual backup
functionality, which means that if attackers were to sabotage automated
systems here, it could be much harder for workers to restore power. 

No manual controls? Yay, progress. But the Ukraine attack could have been worse.

The
fact that the hackers could have done much more damage than they did do
if only they had decided to physically destroy substation equipment as
well, making it much harder to restore power after the blackout. The US
government demonstrated an attack in 2007 that showed how hackers could
physically destroy a power generatorsimply by remotely sending 21 lines
of malicious code.

The Ukrainian grid was hit
again with the NotPetya attack earlier this summer, a cyber attack that
quickly spread globally. It's naive to think that

Our
power grid has been hacked, and it's naive to think that a massive
cyber attack couldn't happen to us. Cyber warfare is the war of the
future and there is more and more proof that it isn't a matter of if,
but when.

Originally published at The Organic Prepper - reposted with permission.


Cyber Warfare Is The Future – Has Our Power Grid Already Been Hacked? – Re-Shared and administered by Aaron Halim

Monday, September 25, 2017

The Golden Age of Jewish-Christian Relations – Israel News – Re-Shared and administered by Aaron Halim



The Golden Age of Jewish-Christian Relations

Earlier
this summer, hundreds of Israelis packed the Jerusalem Cinematheque
theater for the premiere of the Six Day War documentary, “In Our Hands.”
The film traces the steps of the 55th Paratroopers Brigade through
firsthand interviews with IDF soldiers and historical battle
reenactments. Following the screening, an emotional curtain call
featured four of the now elderly paratroopers who appeared in the film.
They shuffled onto the stage to receive bouquets of flowers and a
standing ovation.

There was nothing unusual that evening to
distinguish this event from any of the other Six Day War commemoration
events that took place in Israel or abroad, except for the evening’s
host – Gordon Robertson, CEO of the Christian Broadcasting Network
(CBN).

Robertson, who also served as the film’s executive
director, explained to the Jerusalem audience his motivation as a
Christian to make a film about Israel. “One of the guiding verses for me
in this whole project was Psalm 126: ‘Then they said among the nations,
the Lord has done great things for them.’ And I say to you, ‘The Lord
has done great things for you.’”

While the movie was produced by
CBN, which was founded by Gordon’s father and televangelist Pat
Robertson in 1961, it contained no overtly, or even covertly, Christian
messages.

“This is a film made by Christians, but it is not a
Christian film,” Erin Zimmerman, the film’s director, explained. “The
Six Day War is not a Christian story; it is first and foremost a Jewish
and Israeli story and I wanted to honor that.”


This
desire to honor Israel without strings attached and devoid of
proselytizing is one of the newest, and most welcome, trends in
Christian Zionism. The relationship between Christians and Jews is long
and complex, and a fascinating case study in how shifting theology
correlates to changes in behavior.

A short overview of some major
shifts in Christian beliefs toward Israel can explain this new era of
Christian Zionism marked by greater sensitivity and respect toward the
Jewish People.

Christianity emerged as an offshoot of Judaism
2,000 years ago, putting the two religions immediately at odds. Early
Church Fathers added pagan elements to recruit more local adherents,
thus widening the gap ‒ and animosity ‒ with the Jews.

When it
came to relating to Judaism, Christianity developed what has become
known as “replacement theology.” The idea is that, as a punishment for
rejecting Jesus, God replaced Israel with the Church and the original
Bible (Old Testament) with a new one. It didn’t take long for Jews to go
from being viewed as replaced to rejected, despised and, ultimately,
hated.

Christian love demanded that they try and convert the Jews,
but more often than not, Jews felt more wrath than grace. One could
draw a direct line from replacement theology to the blood libels, forced
conversions, inquisitions, and expulsions that shaped the Middle Ages.

During
the modern period, Christianity underwent an internal revolution known
as the Protestant Reformation, which paved the way for a new approach
for relating to Jews. In the 16th century, Martin Luther battled against
the Catholic Church and advocated for individuals to read the Bible,
made widely available for the first time through the newly invented
printing press, for themselves. No longer was biblical interpretation in
the hands of the ruling elite. Rather, everyone was encouraged to read
and understand God’s word for themselves, which they did in large
numbers.

It doesn’t take much of a bible scholar to recognize that
one theme appears on almost every page and in nearly every chapter of
this holy text ‒ that is the relationship between the land and the
people of Israel. With an open mind and in the absence of previously
held interpretations, a literal reading of the text started to lead some
Christians to begin viewing Jews differently.

For centuries, the
people of Israel had been relegated to sub-human status and the land of
Israel reduced to a metaphor. However, the age of enlightenment allowed
Christians to see the Jews as real people and, in the era of
exploration, they discovered that Israel was an actual place. More and
more Christians started reading the bible literally and saw the
prophecies of the return to Zion as being something within worldly
reach.

The Puritans were among the first Reformed Protestants who
began praying for a Jewish return to their homeland and were responsible
for introducing the idea of Jewish restoration to America. While
popular in England, as well, Restorationism (also described as Christian
Primitivism) struck a noticeable chord in the New World. US presidents
studied Hebrew, and American scholars traveled to Palestine to map out
the area and dig up archeological relics.

At
the time, Restorationism was steeped in replacement theology, which,
even in its benign form, calls for proselytizing the Jews. The
motivating force behind Christian efforts to restore the people to the
land was best summarized by the influential pastor Charles Spurgeon who
preached in 1864: “We look forward, then, for these two things. I am not
going to theorize upon which of them will come first ‒ whether they
shall be restored first, and converted afterward ‒ or converted first
and then restored. They are to be restored and they are to be converted,
too.”

Restorationists were among Theodor Herzl’s most ardent
supporters. The Reverend William Hechler, an Anglican clergyman,
dedicated his life to assisting Herzl upon reading “The Jewish State,”
which was published 12 years after his own treatise, “The Restoration of
the Jews to Palestine.” Hechler immediately began to introduce Herzl to
Europe’s leading political rulers, including German Kaiser Wilhelm,
Queen Victoria of England and the Sultan of Turkey. Appreciatively,
Herzl invited Hechler, in 1897, to the first World Zionist Congress in
Basel as a non-voting delegate and the “first Christian Zionist.”

Major
shifts in Christian theology vis-à- vis Israel continued into the 20th
century because of the Holocaust and the establishment of the State of
Israel. Many Christians recognized the Holocaust as the bitter
culmination of centuries of Christian antisemitism, which led to
soul-searching throughout the Church. Christian thinkers recognized the
perils inherent in replacement theology as playing an active role in the
Holocaust and began to question this theology seriously for the first
time.

The establishment of the State of Israel and its
hard-to-explain successes chipped away at replacement theology from the
opposite direction. Christians began asking themselves: If God had
rejected Israel, then how come the Jews are so successful making the
deserts bloom and defending themselves from their enemies? The
perception that many biblical promises were being fulfilled seemed like
clear and convincing evidence that God had not broken His covenant with
Israel, after all.

In recent decades, Christian Zionist leaders
and organizations have emerged all over the world. In addition to their
political and philanthropic support of Israel, Christian leaders are,
more significantly, for the first time publicly rejecting replacement
theology.

Perhaps the best-known group, the International
Christian Embassy Jerusalem, has a lengthy essay on their website
explaining why they renounce replacement theology. Similarly, Pastor
John Hagee has used his influential ministry, Christians United for
Israel, to unreservedly, “expose the lies of replacement theology.”

To be sure, these Christian Zionist voices are still a minority within the Church.

Nevertheless, we have entered a new age of Jewish-Christian relations.

Chris
Mitchell, CBN’s Middle East bureau chief, said “In Our Hands” doesn’t
ever mention Jesus, a quote from the New Testament or push a Christian
agenda. In that way, “I feel that the movie is a gift to the Jewish
people honoring the soldiers who fought in the Six Day War and the Jews
who waited over two millennia to return to Jerusalem.”

I asked
Mitchell if CBN would have been as sensitive had the movie been released
upon the 25th anniversary of the 1967 war in the early 1980s. He said,
“There has definitely been a remarkable development of deeper
relationships between Jews and Christians in recent years. A greater
understanding of the Jewish community and getting to know each other
better has led to more sensitivity.”

Christian theology has
shifted since its inception and has never been as respectful toward the
Jewish people than it is now. The growth of Christian Zionism is a
direct outcome of this change, so it is no wonder that Israel is
enjoying unparalleled support from large segments of Christianity. After
2,000 years, Christian-Jewish relations are entering a new, golden era
of restoration without replacement.

Reprinted with author’s permission from The Jerusalem Post

Read
more at
https://www.jpost.com/Jerusalem-Report/Restoration-without-replacement-Golden-age-of-Jewish-Christian-relations-504245#j3EHDx7bDlWKsQ0D.99


The Golden Age of Jewish-Christian Relations – Israel News – Re-Shared and administered by Aaron Halim

US Congress Slams Back at UN Israel Blacklist With Anti-Boycott Bill – Breaking Israel News | Latest News. Biblical Perspective. – Re-Shared and administered by Aaron Halim



ongress Fights Back Against UN’s Anti-Israel Blacklist With ‘Anti-Boycott Act’

“I
will bless those who bless you And curse him that curses you; And all
the families of the earth Shall bless themselves by you.” Genesis 12:3 (The Israel Bible™)
In
response to United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) efforts to
undermine Israel’s legitimacy through their Boycott, Divestment, and
Sanctions (BDS) Act of 2017, the U.S. Congress and Senate have
introduced a bipartisan bill, the “Israel Anti-Boycott Act,” that would
protect U.S. companies targeted by the international boycotts and punish
those who comply with them.


Earlier
this March, the UNHRC voted in favor (32 nations in favor and 15
abstentions) of the BDS Act of 2017, which entails creating a
“blacklist” of companies enabling or benefitting from the growth of
Israeli settlements.
Blacklisted
companies under the BDS Act of 2017, the full list of which will be
published this December, include major American corporations like
Coca-Cola, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Airbnb, and TripAdvisor.


The
UN blacklist treads in the footsteps of the broader BDS movement, which
was established in 2005 in an attempt to economically undermine
Israel’s sovereignty. The stated goal of the BDS movement, according to
its founders, is to “end international support for Israel’s oppression
of Palestinians and pressure Israel to comply with international law.”





US Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL). (Flickr/Gage Skidmore)
In
response to the UN’s blacklist, Representative Peter J. Roskam (R-IL)
and Senators Benjamin L. Cardin (D-MD) and Marco Rubio (R-FL) introduced
the Israel Anti-Boycott Act (
H.R. 1697 and S.720). The US Act has seen overwhelming support, with 49 senators and 253 House members
co-sponsoring it  to date. The bill was initiated in the context of a
strong U.S.-Israel alliance celebrating the U.S. government’s proud
history of protecting the Jewish State from economic warfare.


The
U.S. Israel Anti-Boycott Act would bolster the 40-year-old American
policy of challenging boycotts against its allies and highlight U.S.
support for Israel as its strongest ally in the Middle East. In the
past, Congress has successfully tackled foreign boycotts against Israel.
In 2015, former U.S. President Barack Obama passed the Trade Promotion
Authority (TPA), which instructed American negotiators to take an
anti-BDS position in ongoing free trade negotiations with the EU.


The
Israel Anti-Boycott Act also underscores the importance of direct talks
between the Israelis and Palestinians, as the unilateral adoption of
the UN blacklist could further destabilize any attempts to bring
Israelis and Palestinians to the negotiations for direct peace
negotiations.


In
practice, the pro-Israel bill would apply existing U.S. anti-boycott
laws to international organizations like the UN and European Union,
which often single out American companies doing business in Judea and
Samaria, hoping to pressure them into boycotting Israel.


Nikki
Haley, the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, criticized the United
Nations support for the BDS Act of 2017, saying, “Blacklisting
companies without even looking at their employment practices or their
contributions to local empowerment, but rather based entirely on their
location in areas of conflict, is contrary to the laws of international
trade and to any reasonable definition of human rights.



“It is an attempt to provide an international stamp of approval to the anti-Semitic BDS movement. It must be rejected.”




US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley (Wikimedia Commons)
Many
consider the BDS movement to be anti-Semitic because it holds Israel,
as the sole Jewish state, to a different standard than other countries.
While human rights violations run rampant in Syria, North Korea, Yemen,
Russia, Sudan, and Iran, the UN singles out Israel as the greatest
violator of health rights, Palestinian sites, women’s rights, Middle
Eastern peace, and human rights.


Israeli
ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, Eviatar Manor, calls the
HRC “obsessive compulsive” on Israel, as the international organization
lambasts Israel while it overlooks abuses against millions worldwide.


Economic
warfare against Israel is not new for the UNHRC. This past spring, the
UNHCR voted on 41 resolutions, 12 of which dealt with human rights
violations around the world, and five of which were focused on Israel.
One of the resolutions passed mandated a boycott of Israeli settlements
and called upon members to “distinguish, in their relevant dealings,
between the territory of the State of Israel and the territories
occupied since 1967.”
                                                        

If
American companies were to comply with the UN’s BDS Act of 2017 by
boycotting firms on the blacklist, they could risk harming Israelis,
Palestinians, and even their own domestic economy. In 2015, over 500
Palestinian workers were left unemployed after the SodaStream factory
was relocated from the West Bank to southern Israel because of pressure
from the BDS movement.


Last year, Israel was the United States’ 22nd largest trade partner, trading over $40 billion annually. According to Aaron Menenbeg of The Tower,
out of the twenty countries with which the U.S. has trade agreements,
Israel is the eighth-largest supporter of American jobs and Israeli
exports generate the highest amount of export dollars per job. If
American companies were to adopt the UN blacklist, the robust
U.S.-Israel economic ties would be risked, undermining the American
economy at large.


If the
Israel Anti-Boycott Act passes in the U.S. Senate and House, it will
then be sent to the U.S. president to be enacted into law.

US Congress Slams Back at UN Israel Blacklist With Anti-Boycott Bill – Breaking Israel News | Latest News. Biblical Perspective. – Re-Shared and administered by Aaron Halim

A HERO AMONG COWARDS: Ex-Army Ranger Alejandro Villanueva Only Steeler Standing On Field For National Anthem • Now The End Begins – Re-Shared and administered by Aaron Halim



A HERO AMONG COWARDS: Ex-Army Ranger Alejandro Villanueva Only Steeler Standing On Field For National Anthem

All but one of the Pittsburgh Steelers decided to protest by staying in
their locker room, during the playing of the national anthem at this
afternoon’s game in Chicago. The lone dissenter was former Army Ranger
Alejandro Villanueva who bucked the team’s decision and took the field,
anyway, hand over his heart and helmet under his arm.
Alejandro-Villanueva-only-steeler-standing-boycott-nfl-take-knee-nteb

All
but one of the Pittsburgh Steelers decided to protest by staying in
their locker room, during the playing of the national anthem at this
afternoon’s game in Chicago.

EDITOR’S NOTE:
Take a good look people, this is what an everyday patriot looks like.
Someone who has the guts to stand against the opposition and take a
stand for what’s right. Alejandro Villanueva knows that standing with
your hand over your heart for the playing of our National Anthem is the
right thing to do. Taking a knee and disrespecting the country that made
you wealthy is the wrong to do. I believe that Colin Kaepernick’s
original protest, while misguided, was organic and true. But what we are
seeing now can absolutely be traced back to George Soros and his paid
agitators. Welcome to Day One of the NFL Boycott.


The lone dissenter
was former Army Ranger Alejandro Villanueva who bucked the team’s
decision and took the field, anyway, hand over his heart and helmet
under his arm.

On Sunday morning, reports emerged that the Steelers
had decided to stay in their locker room despite league rules requiring
the team to be on the sidelines during the playing of the national
anthem.

By game time, the team did, indeed, fulfill their announced intentions. However, Villanueva defied his team and took the field:

This isn’t the first time the Steelers’ offensive tackle has been at odds with fellow players over anthem protests.

Last year, Villanueva criticized Colin Kaepernick for his protests during the national anthem:

“I
don’t know if the most effective way is to sit down during the national
anthem with a country that’s providing you freedom, providing you $16
million a year … when there are black minorities that are dying in Iraq
and Afghanistan for less than $20,000 a year,” Villanueva said of the
anthem protests.

The Mississippi native has a good reason for his position. He is himself a veteran with three tours of duty in Afghanistan.

Villanueva
was a Captain in the U.S. Army during much of his service overseas and
now stands at the rank of Major in the 1st Battalion, 75th Ranger
Regiment. He was also the recipient of the Bronze Star with “V” device.

Even
as he continued his Army career, Villanueva was given several workouts
with teams such as the Cincinnati Bengals and the Philadelphia Eagles.
He remained unsigned after the Eagles took him off the practice squad,
though, until Steelers’ coach Mike Tomlin signed him in 2014.

Villanueva is now starting left tackle with a four-year, $24 million contract with the Steelers. source



A HERO AMONG COWARDS: Ex-Army Ranger Alejandro Villanueva Only Steeler Standing On Field For National Anthem • Now The End Begins – Re-Shared and administered by Aaron Halim

Conservative Catholics Accuse Pope Francis Of Heresy As Theological Split In Catholic Church Grows Wider • Now The End Begins – Re-Shared and administered by Aaron Halim

Conservative Catholics Accuse Pope Francis Of Heresy As Theological Split In Catholic Church Grows Wider

In a 25-page letter delivered to Pope Francis last month and provided
Saturday to The Associated Press, the 62 signatories issued a "filial
correction" to the pope — a measure they said hadn't been employed since
the 14th century. The letter accused Pope Francis of propagating seven
heretical positions concerning marriage, moral life and the sacraments
with his 2016 document "The Joy of Love" and subsequent "acts, words and
omissions."
conservative-catholics-accuse-pope-francis-heresy-vatican-whore-revelation

Several
dozen tradition-minded Roman Catholic theologians, priests and
academics have formally accused Pope Francis of spreading heresy with
his 2016 opening to divorced and civilly remarried Catholics.

“So
he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman
sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having
seven heads and ten horns. And the woman was arrayed in purple and
scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls,
having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of
her fornication: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY,
BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.”
Revelation 17:13-15 (KJV)

EDITOR’S NOTE: As far as I am concerned, everything
the Catholic church teaches is heresy, but it’s oh-so-interesting to
see a huge church split in the making with the old unholy Vatican whore
of Revelation 17 and 18. PT Barnum was right when he said “you can’t
fool all the people all the time”, and the slippery Pope Francis’  jet
ski is about to hit the rocks. The natives are restless, Frankie boy,
look sharp! I guess papal infallibility is not what it used to be, lol. 


In a 25-page letter delivered
to Pope Francis last month and provided Saturday to The Associated
Press, the 62 signatories issued a “filial correction” to the pope — a
measure they said hadn’t been employed since the 14th century.

The
letter accused Pope Francis of propagating seven heretical positions
concerning marriage, moral life and the sacraments with his 2016
document “The Joy of Love” and subsequent “acts, words and omissions.”

The
initiative follows another formal act by four tradition-minded
cardinals who wrote Francis last year asking him to clarify a series of
questions, or “dubbia,” they had about his 2016 text.

Pope
Francis hasn’t responded to either initiative. The Vatican spokesman
didn’t immediately respond to an email seeking comment late Saturday.

None of the signatories
of the new letter is a cardinal, and the highest-ranking churchman
listed is actually someone whose organization has no legal standing in
the Catholic Church: Bishop Bernard Fellay, superior of the breakaway
Society of St. Pius X. Several other signatories are well-known admirers
of the old Latin Mass which Fellay’s followers celebrate.

But
organizers said the initiative was nevertheless significant and a sign
of the concern among a certain contingent of academics and pastors over
Francis’ positions, which they said posed a danger to the faithful.

“There
is a role for theologians and philosophers to explain to people the
church’s teaching, to correct misunderstandings,” said Joseph Shaw, a
spokesman for the initiative, signatory of the correction and senior
research fellow in moral philosophy at Oxford University.

When it was released in April 2016, “The Joy of Love
immediately sparked controversy because it opened the door to letting
civilly remarried Catholics receive Communion. Church teaching holds
that unless these Catholics obtain an annulment — a church decree that
their first marriage was invalid — they cannot receive the sacraments,
since they are seen as committing adultery.

Francis didn’t create a
church-wide pass for these Catholics, but suggested — in vague terms
and strategically placed footnotes — that bishops and priests could do
so on a case-by-case basis after accompanying them on a spiritual
journey of discernment. Subsequent comments and writings have made clear
he intended such wiggle room, part of his belief that God’s mercy
extends in particular to sinners and that the Eucharist isn’t a prize
for the perfect but nourishment for the weak.

Shaw said none of
the four cardinals involved in the initial “dubbia” letter, nor any
other cardinal, was involved in the “filial correction.”

Organizers said the last time such a correction was issued was to Pope John XXII in 1333 for errors which he later recanted. source





Conservative Catholics Accuse Pope Francis Of Heresy As Theological Split In Catholic Church Grows Wider • Now The End Begins – Re-Shared and administered by Aaron Halim